When I started to think about this project my knowledge of 17th century Scotland was sketchy at best, and my knowledge of the mid-century in particular could have gone on the back of a postage stamp - in BIG letters. I had to find out everything - the political context, the significant events, the movers and shakers, then the social context, how people lived, what they wore, how they might have thought. I had no contacts with expertise in the field, and even if I did locate one, was diffident about approaching him or her with this vague idea of a fiction for goodness sake. I imagined a rather patronising putdown. 'Oh, I suppose you're trying to emulate Hilary Mantel? Such a vogue for historical novels at the moment. Never read them myself. Now what exactly do you want to know?'
That was it. I didn't know what I needed to know until I knew more. For someone my age using the internet seemed such a lazy way to find out stuff. Far too easy. Think of a person. Click. Up comes Wikipedia. Think of a place. Click. Up comes some tourist information, lists of hotels and b+bs, activities for all the family and some pretty pictures. Bits of history might come up as well. Later I was to discover some more useful and relevant information from the net, but initially I was wary. All those pages framed with distracting advertisements. How accurate was the information? How authoritative could it possibly be?
So I went to books. Biographies first. These were the easiest to get hold of and the most accessible to read. Charles II was a key figure. Antonia Fraser and Jenny Uglow had impressive biographies, with extensive bibliographies. Bibliographies would become important. However, I started with the books themselves. Jenny Uglow's focuses on the Restoration and after. A bit later than I wanted, but it showed what Charles II became and that was important. Antonia Fraser deals with his life as a whole. And that showed how he grew up, was educated and how his life was disrupted by the turbulence of the English Civil War. However, I wanted information on his abortive visit to Scotland in 1650-51. Antonia Fraser's biography gave me a start, but there wasn't as much as I wanted. A bibliographical reference, however, sent me to an older biography by Hester Chapman called The Tragedy of Charles II, and she had more on his sad year in Scotland. It was important because the way he was treated by the Scots government and the kirk during that year soured his feelings about the Scots, and after he left on the ill-fated campaign that ended at Worcester he never returned to Scotland again. Being a Scot, that bothered me.
I moved on to other biographies covering his family. Much was made of his dark skin. On his mother's side his grandmother, Marie de Medicis, was Italian. His grandfather was Henri IV, who thought Paris was worth a Mass and was assassinated in 1610. His mother grew up at the French court. She took refuge there when she had to flee England and he joined her there. How had that affected him? Her fervent Catholicism? The absolutism of the French court? How about his relationships with his brothers and sisters? Then he took refuge in Holland, always in vain seeking support for the Stuart restoration. The eldest of his sisters was married to the Prince of Orange. So I began delving into Dutch history and their long wars with Spain. It was to negotiate with him in Holland that the seven commissioners of the Scottish government came after his father's execution in 1649 to discuss the terms on which the Scots might assist him to regain his throne. Antonia Fraser's biography made reference to the diary of a certain Alexander Jaffray, a minister from Aberdeen, who was one of those commissioners. Now this was a primary text, which I was able to dowload and read online. He had regretted the way in which he and his fellow commissioners had refused to compromise their demands on the prince, then only 19 years old, but at the time he had been one of the most intransigent. Jaffray later, curiously, became a Quaker - that form of religion coming to Scotland among the independents in Cromwell's army, such anathema to the Scots kirk.
I was no nearer composing a fiction. Was Charles II to figure in it as a character, or merely as someone observed? However, I was beginning to get a handle on a great deal of background information. A stack of reporters' notebooks was filling up.
No comments:
Post a Comment